On March 22, 2015 10:34:04 AM GMT+01:00, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> >wrote: >> On March 22, 2015 6:17:28 AM GMT+01:00, Michael Paquier ><michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>>> Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >>>>> Pushed with that additional change. Let's see if the buildfarm >>>thinks. >>>> >>>> jacana, apparently alone among buildfarm members, does not like it. >>> >>>All the windows nodes don't pass tests with this patch, the >difference >>>is in the exponential precision: e+000 instead of e+00. >> >> That's due to a different patch though, right? When I checked earlier >only jacana had problems due to this, and it looked like random memory >was being output. It's interesting that that's on the one windows (not >cygwin) critter that does the 128bit dance... > >Yes, sorry, the e+000 stuff is from 959277a. This patch has visibly >broken that: >http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=jacana&dt=2015-03-21%2003%3A01%3A21
That's the stuff looking like random memory that I talk about above... -- Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone. Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
