On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Ooops. But shouldn't that have failed 100% of the time in a CCA build? >> Or is the candidates list fairly noncritical? > > The candidates list is absolutely critical.
However, the problematic code path is only a couple of times in the regression test. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
