* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> writes: > > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> Ooops. But shouldn't that have failed 100% of the time in a CCA build? > >> Or is the candidates list fairly noncritical? > > > The candidates list is absolutely critical. > > Oh, I was confusing CCA with RELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE, which does something > a bit different. I wonder whether we should get rid of that symbol and > just drive the test in RelationClose off CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS. > (Ditto for CATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE.) Or maybe make CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS > #define the other two symbols.
Ah. Seems like that'd make sense to me, though I guess I'd prefer just
driving it all off of CCA.
Thanks!
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
