Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> writes:
> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Ooops. But shouldn't that have failed 100% of the time in a CCA build?
>> Or is the candidates list fairly noncritical?
> The candidates list is absolutely critical.
Oh, I was confusing CCA with RELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE, which does something
a bit different. I wonder whether we should get rid of that symbol and
just drive the test in RelationClose off CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS.
(Ditto for CATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE.) Or maybe make CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS
#define the other two symbols.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
