On Thursday 05 December 2002 09:37, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Lamar Owen wrote: > > However, I seriously question the need in the long term for our sites to > > be as fractured as they are. Good grief! We've got
> note that altho they are seperate URLs, the end result is going to be that > http://www.postgresql.org we become the "town square" of sorts, which > should be "real soon now" ... > jdbc/odbc are 'project sites' off of gborg, similar to what sourceforge > provides ... Glad to hear this. One question: is there any particular reason the www list is closed? Just curious -- reading archives of this list, or getting a digest or this list, even in a read-only manner, might alleviate some misconceptions. Those who care can at least read what's planned for the web site. As far as advocacy is concerned, I made a conscious decision to not read that list -- I don't need to be convinced to use PostgreSQL. :-). Nor am I necessarily a good 'advocacy' person......my 'convincing' many times comes across much different from what I meant. So I don't read that list. Can you (or Vince) distill a roadmap for the website and post here, on hackers? -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
