Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 07/18/2015 04:15 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >>If it's there just to so you can run the regression tests that come > >>with it, it might make sense to just add a "default" case to that > >>switch to handle any unrecognized commands, and perhaps even remove > >>the cases for the currently untested subcommands as it's just dead > >>code. > > > >Well, I would prefer to have an output that says "unrecognized" and then > >add more test cases to the SQL files so that there's not so much dead > >code. I prefer that to removing the C support code, because then as > >we add extra tests we don't need to modify the C source. > > Ok. I added a case for AT_ReAddComment, and also a default-case that says > "unrecognized".
Oh, sorry, I forgot to tell you that I was working on it. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
