On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 16:06:28 -0400
Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Bill Moran <wmo...@potentialtech.com> writes:
> > On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 11:39:15 -0700
> > Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> >> Nope.  In fact, even the one which was 90% complete (replacing zlib with
> >> lz4) completely dropped off the radar.
> 
> > Interesting ... I wasn't looking at doing that, rather adjusting the
> > decision logic on when to compress, as well as making the trigger values
> > configurable so as to open the TOAST logic up to easy user configuration
> > at the DB as well as the table level. I figure this will also need enough
> > testing to feel like we're shipping with reasonable default values.
> 
> I have a vague feeling that we've accreted some code that has dependencies
> on the current TOAST behavior.  Unfortunately it's no more than a vague
> feeling so I can't tell you where to look; but it'd be a good idea to look
> around and/or test, rather than just assume we can let users frob these
> knobs to whatever random settings they feel like.
> 
> I don't want to discourage you from the idea of making these things
> accessible, just suggesting that there may be more work to do than simply
> making them accessible.  There may be a need for fairly strict sanity
> checking on the values.

Good to know. I guess it's a good thing that I'm giving myself a full year to
work on this ...

-- 
Bill Moran


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to