On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Arthur Silva <arthur...@gmail.com> wrote: > In the other hand PG tuple overhead is already the largest among the > alternatives. > Even if storage keeps getting faster and cheaper stuff you can't ignore the > overhead of adding yet another 8bytes to each tuple.
+1, very much. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
