On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >> So my vote is for the original approach. (I've not read Josh's patch, >> so there might be something wrong with it in detail, but I like the >> basic approach.) > > +1
OK, committed and back-patched that all the way back to 9.0. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
