On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > That opens up for lock escalation and deadlocks, doesn't it? You are > probably thinking that it's okay to ignore those but I don't necessarily > agree with that.
Agreed. I think we're making a mountain out of a molehill here. As long as the locks that are actually used are monotonic, just use > and stick a comment in there explaining that it could need adjustment if we use other lock levels in the future. I presume all the lock-levels used for DDL are, and will always be, self-exclusive, so why all this hand-wringing? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
