On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> if (options.single_txn && options.action != ACT_FILE &&
> options.action == ACT_NOTHING)
> {
> fprintf(stderr, _("%s: -1 can only be used in
> non-interactive mode\n"), pset.progname);
> exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> }
>
> the expression should be probably only?
>
> options.single_txn && options.action == ACT_NOTHING)
It seems this was changed by this commit:
commit c3c86ae2aff67676a49ec84240f1d6a482f359cb
Author: Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net>
Date: Mon Jun 17 21:53:33 2013 -0400
psql: Re-allow -1 together with -c or -l
I guess the idea was that we wanted to allow -1 with -c or -l even
though it will have no effect in that case. So your suggested change
looks right to me.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
