Hello, > FWIW Horiguchi-san is one of the few people who actually took time to > review
I personally think such kind of things should not to be counted in judging this issue:) > the multivariate stats patch, and I don't quite see this patch > as conflicting with the multivariate one. > > It implements a small subset of the (much larger) multivariate stats > patch, and reusing it within my patch should not be a big > deal. Actually, this type of statistics was proposed by Horiguchi-san > himself, and the multivariate patch does not implement it yet > (although I intend to address that soon). Year. I think we can deal Tomas's patch as natural enhancement of this patch and it is not so bad as a vangard(?). > So no conflict here. Of course, we need to be a bit careful to make it > compatible (especially the syntax part). I agree with it. They don't make bad conflict but we might stuc by wrong decision in API, like syntax will. regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
