On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Tomas Vondra <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I'm arguing for fixing the existing bug, and then addressing the case of > over-estimation separately, with proper analysis.
Well, this is part of how we're looking it differently. I think the bug is "we're passing a value to palloc that is too large, so sometimes it fails" and the way to fix that is to properly limit the value. You are clearly defining the bug a bit differently. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
