On 15 October 2015 at 16:48, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2015-10-15 16:02:23 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: >> There's an oversight in replication origins support in logical >> decoding, where the origin node ID isn't passed correctly to callbacks >> except for the origin filter callback. All other callbacks see it as >> InvalidRepOriginId. > > Only for the transaction, right? I.e. the stuff on changes should be > correct? Your description sounds like it's more than that? > > I don't think your fix is entirely correct, the > XLogRecGetOrigin(buf->record) shouldn't be in the XACT_XINFO_HAS_ORIGIN > block.
Advertising
I guess since it'll be InvalidRepOriginId otherwise, that makes sense. > Your test prints the origins from the transaction instead the changes - > why? I don't understand this part. Do you mean: + BEGIN (from "test_decoding: regression_slot" at lsn 0/AABBCCFF) ? -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
