Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> As a down payment on this problem, maybe we could invent a new planner
>> header that provides just enough info to support amapi.h and fdwapi.h;
>> it looks like this would be "typedef struct PlannerInfo PlannerInfo;",
>> likewise for RelOptInfo, ForeignPath, and IndexPath, and real declarations
>> of Cost and Selectivity.
> Works for me, under the assumption that, down the road and without any
> rush, we can shuffle some more stuff around to make this whole area a
> bit cleaner.
Well, since we're at the start of a devel cycle, we'd have the rest of 9.6
for somebody to whack it around to their heart's content. Once we ship
9.6 it would get a little harder to redefine the new header(s).
>> Not sure what to name the new header.
> Yeah, this is always a problem for such patches :-( I have no great
> ideas ATM.
I'll draft something, but in the meantime, file name ideas solicited.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
