Hi, On November 6, 2015 9:31:37 PM GMT+01:00, Jesper Pedersen <jesper.peder...@redhat.com> wrote: >I have been testing this on a smaller system than yours - 2 socket >Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2683 v3 w/ 2 x RAID10 SSD disks (data + xlog), >so focused on a smaller number of clients.
Thanks for running tests! >While I saw an improvement for the 'synchronous_commit = on' case - >there is a small regression for 'off', using -M prepared + Unix Domain >Socket. If that is something that should be considered right now. What tests where you running, in which order? I presume it's a read/write pgbench? What scale, shared buffers? I right now can't see any reason sc on/off should be relevant for the patch. Could it be an artifact of the order you ran tests in? Did you initdb between tests? Pgbench -i? Restart the database? Andres --- Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
