On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Amit Langote > <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> While going through nodeGather.c, I noticed portions of the file header >> comment that may have been obsoleted by recent revisions of the relevant >> parellelism code. For example, there is a reference to PartialSeqScan node >> which did not make it into the tree. Attached fixes it. Also, wondering if >> the semantics of Gather node is that of Scan or more generic Plan? That is >> to ask whether the following edit makes sense: >> >> * nodeGather.c >> - * Support routines for scanning a plan via multiple workers. >> + * Support routines for getting the result from a plan via multiple >> + * workers. >> * > > Well I think "scanning a plan" is clear enough even if it's > technically a Scan. But I agree the second change is needed.
Err, even if it's NOT technically a scan. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
