On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In terms of this project overall, NumLWLocks() now knows about only
> four categories of stuff: fixed lwlocks, backend locks (proc.c),
> replication slot locks, and locks needed by extensions.  I think it'd
> probably be fine to move the backend locks into PGPROC directly, and
> the replication slot locks into ReplicationSlot.

IIdus has written a patch to move backend locks into PGPROC which
I am reviewing and will do performance tests once he responds to
my review comments and I have written a patch to move replication
slot locks into ReplicationSlot which is attached with this mail.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment: replslot_iolwlock_tranche_v1.patch
Description: Binary data

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to