Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> writes: > On 1/3/16 10:26 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: >> Thanks, this is more or less what I... just did..
> Sorry, didn't realize you were on it. >> A couple of tests in regproc.sql would be a good addition as well. > Added. I'm gonna call this good for now. Note this is just against HEAD > since I don't have 9.5 setup yet. Presumably the patch should still apply... I'll take a look, but Michael, if you have time to review, an extra set of eyeballs wouldn't hurt. There is no margin for error right now. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers