On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> writes:
>> On 1/3/16 10:26 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> Thanks, this is more or less what I... just did..
>> Sorry, didn't realize you were on it.
>>> A couple of tests in regproc.sql would be a good addition as well.
>> Added. I'm gonna call this good for now. Note this is just against HEAD
>> since I don't have 9.5 setup yet. Presumably the patch should still apply...
> I'll take a look, but Michael, if you have time to review, an extra set
> of eyeballs wouldn't hurt.  There is no margin for error right now.

I'm just on it :) Will update in a couple of minutes, I noticed some
stuff in Jim's patch.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to