On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> wrote: > It seems like a useful function to have, but perhaps it should just be > called trim() rather than numeric_trim(), for consistency with the > names of the other numeric functions, which don't start with > "numeric_".
That wouldn't work in this case, because we have hard-coded parser productions for TRIM(). -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
