On 2016-01-11 20:03:18 +0100, Andres Freund wrote: > More generally, I'm doubtful that the approach of reading data from WAL > as proposed here is a very good idea. It seems better to "just" dump the > entire 2pc state into *one* file at checkpoint time.
Or better: After determining the checkpoint redo location, insert a WAL record representing the entire 2PC state as of that moment. That way it can easily restored during WAL replay and nothing special has to be done on a standby. This way we'll need no extra wal flushes and fsyncs. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
