On 2016-01-11 19:15:23 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > On 11 January 2016 at 19:03, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On 2016-01-09 15:29:11 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > > > Hmm, I was just preparing this for commit. > > > > Just read downthread that you want to commit this soon. Please hold of > > for a while, this doesn't really look ready to me. I don't have time for > > a real review right now, but I'll try to get to it asap. > > > > "A real review"? Huh.
All I meant was that my email didn't consist out of a real review, but just was a quick scan > > More generally, I'm doubtful that the approach of reading data from WAL > > as proposed here is a very good idea. It seems better to "just" dump the > > entire 2pc state into *one* file at checkpoint time. > > > > I think you misunderstand the proposed approach. This isn't just to do > with reading things back at checkpoint. Sure, the main purpose is not to write 2pc state files in the common path - or is that not the main purpose? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
