On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:53 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is, but sometime the polymorphic types can help.
> The proposed feature/syntax has sense primary for polymorphic types. It
> should to follow our polymorphic types. The primary pair is
> "anyarray","anyelement" -> "arraytype","elemementtype".
> If you don't use polymorphic parameters in plpgsql, then proposed feature
> can look like useless.
I don't think it's useless, but I do think the syntax is ugly. Maybe
it's the best we can do and we should just live with it, but Alvaro
asked for opinions, so there's mine.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: