On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:53 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is, but sometime the polymorphic types can help.
> The proposed feature/syntax has sense primary for polymorphic types. It
> should to follow our polymorphic types. The primary pair is
> "anyarray","anyelement"  -> "arraytype","elemementtype".
> If you don't use polymorphic parameters in plpgsql, then proposed feature
> can look like useless.

I don't think it's useless, but I do think the syntax is ugly.  Maybe
it's the best we can do and we should just live with it, but Alvaro
asked for opinions, so there's mine.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to