On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:53 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: > It is, but sometime the polymorphic types can help. > > The proposed feature/syntax has sense primary for polymorphic types. It > should to follow our polymorphic types. The primary pair is > "anyarray","anyelement" -> "arraytype","elemementtype". > > If you don't use polymorphic parameters in plpgsql, then proposed feature > can look like useless.
I don't think it's useless, but I do think the syntax is ugly. Maybe it's the best we can do and we should just live with it, but Alvaro asked for opinions, so there's mine. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
