On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Another tool that we had better IMO put some efforts in porting
> into core is sqlsmith, which would actually be a complete rewrite
> because the upstream code is under GPL license and depends on libpqxx.

Then Andreas Seltenreich better get a commit bit. I've seen him turn
around changes in sqlsmith to test new areas of Postgres in a couple
of days. That's a big reason why he has been so effective.

What benefit does porting sqlsmith for inclusion in core have? I can
only think of costs, including those that you mentioned.

Peter Geoghegan

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to