On 1/25/16 2:48 AM, Torsten Zühlsdorff wrote: > Nobody, but there are different solutions. And the same solutions works > different in quality and quantity in the different projects. > In FreeBSD for example there is an online tool for review > (http://review.freebsd.org) which was opened to public. There you can > review any code, left comments in the parts you wanted, submit different > users to it etc. > It is not perfect, but a huge step forward for the project. And > something i misses here often. > But as stated earlier in another thread: for a not-so-deep-involved > volunteer, it is often unclear *what* to review. The threads are long > and often there is no final description about how the patch is supposed > to work. That make testing quite hard and time consuming.
I agree better code review tooling could help a bit. The URL you post above doesn't work at the moment (for me), though. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers