On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:07 AM, Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
> I do not think that it is really worth fixing, but I will not prevent anyone
> to fix it.

I still think it does. Well, if there is consensus to address this one
and optionally the other integer overflows even on back branches, I'll
write a patch and let's call that a deal. This is not a problem from
my side.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to