On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote:
> On 1/26/16 10:56 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> What we should do is
>> 1. Map "archive" and "hot_standby" to one level with a new name that
>> indicates that it can be used for both/either backup or replication.
>>       (My suggested name for the new level is "replica"...)
> I have been leaning toward making up a new name, too, but hadn't found a
> good one.  I tend to like "replica", though.

"replica" sounds nice.

>> 2. Deprecate "archive" and "hot_standby" so that those will be removed
>> in a later release.
> If we do 1, then we might as well get rid of the old names right away.


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to