Dne 5. 2. 2016 1:33 napsal uĹživatel "Tom Lane" <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>
> Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes:
> > [ num_nulls_v6.patch ]
>
> I started looking through this.  It seems generally okay, but I'm not
> very pleased with the function name "num_notnulls".  I think it would
> be better as "num_nonnulls", as I see Oleksandr suggested already.

I have no problem with it.

Regards

Pavel
>
>                         regards, tom lane

Reply via email to