2016-02-12 14:10 GMT+01:00 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>:

> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> There will be necessary more changes than this. Orafce has some parts
> >> based on lw locks. I am able to compile it without any issue. But the
> lock
> >> mechanism is broken now - so impact on extensions will be higher. Have
> to do
> >> some research.
> >
> > if somebody would to use it for testing
> >
> > https://github.com/orafce/orafce
> >
> https://github.com/orafce/orafce/commit/fff56ed7e17ed5d6f8e6b71591ff1a6d6ff12d79
> >
> > With last commit I am able to compile orafce without warnings, but
> > installcheck is broken. It can be bug in orafce, but this code worked
> last 7
> > years.
>
> That's very strange.  It looks to me like you did exactly the right
> thing.  Can you provide any details on how it fails?
>

Looks like some race conditions is there - but I didn't tested it deeper

Pavel


>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

Reply via email to