On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> There will be necessary more changes than this. Orafce has some parts >> based on lw locks. I am able to compile it without any issue. But the lock >> mechanism is broken now - so impact on extensions will be higher. Have to do >> some research. > > if somebody would to use it for testing > > https://github.com/orafce/orafce > https://github.com/orafce/orafce/commit/fff56ed7e17ed5d6f8e6b71591ff1a6d6ff12d79 > > With last commit I am able to compile orafce without warnings, but > installcheck is broken. It can be bug in orafce, but this code worked last 7 > years.
That's very strange. It looks to me like you did exactly the right thing. Can you provide any details on how it fails? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers