> Dmitry Ivanov <d.iva...@postgrespro.ru> writes: > > As of now there's no way to transfer the ownership of an object and all > > its > > dependent objects in one step. One has to manually alter the owner of each > > object, be it a table, a schema or something else. > > TBH, this sounds like a completely terrible idea. There are far too many > sorts of dependencies across which one would not expect ownership to > propagate; for example, use of a function in a view, or even just a > foreign key dependency between two tables.
Well, actually this is a statement of the fact, and I don't propose enabling this option for every dependency possible. This patch includes an experimental feature that anyone can try and discuss, nothing more. Besides, it acts a lot like 'drop ... cascade' (the findDependentObjects() function is used under the hood), so the behavior is totally predictable. It also writes down all objects that have been touched, so no change goes unnoticed. > I'm not even clear that there are *any* cases where this behavior is > wanted, other than perhaps ALTER OWNER on an extension At very least this might be useful in order to change owner of all tables which inherit some table. -- Dmitry Ivanov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com Russian Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers