* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Christoph Berg <m...@debian.org> writes: > > The attached patch has successfully been included in the 9.6 Debian > > package, passed the regression tests there, and I've also done some > > chmod/chown tests on the filesystem to verify it indeed catches the > > cases laid out by Tom. > > Please add this to the upcoming commitfest. We don't seem to have > enough consensus to just apply it, but perhaps the review process > will produce some agreement.
Just to be clear, I'm not really against this patch as-is, but it shouldn't be a precedent or limit us from supporting more permissive permissions in other areas (or even here) if there are sensible use-cases for more permissive permissions. Thanks! Stephen
Description: Digital signature