Re: Tom Lane 2016-02-22 <>
> Stephen Frost <> writes:
> > Just to be clear, I'm not really against this patch as-is, but it
> > shouldn't be a precedent or limit us from supporting more permissive
> > permissions in other areas (or even here) if there are sensible
> > use-cases for more permissive permissions.
> OK, and to be clear, I'm not against considering other use-cases and
> trying to do something appropriate for them.  I just reject the idea
> that it's unnecessary or inappropriate for us to be concerned about
> whether secret-holding files are secure.

I added the patch to the CF:

(I put it under "System administration" and not under "Security"
because it concerns operation.)

-- |

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to