On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Haribabu Kommi > <kommi.harib...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Dmitriy Sarafannikov >> <d.sarafanni...@bk.ru> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have found incorrect error message in InitializeSessionUserId function >>> if you try to connect to database by role Oid (for example >>> BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid). >>> If role have no permissions to login, you will see error message like this: >>> FATAL: role "(null)" is not permitted to log in >>> >>> I changed few lines of code and fixed this. >>> Patch is attached. >>> I want to add this patch to commitfest. >>> Any objections? >>> >> >> The patch adds the support of taking the role name from the role tuple >> instead of using the provided rolename variable, because it is possible >> that rolename variable is NULL if the connection is from a background >> worker. >> >> The patch is fine, I didn't find any problems, I marked it as ready for >> committer. >> >> IMO this patch may need to backpatch supported branches as it is >> a bug fix. Committer can decide. > > +1 for the backpatch. The current error message should the rolename be > undefined in this context is misleading for users.
Back-patched to 9.5. I don't think this is relevant for earlier branches. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers