On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > This does not sound like Bruce at all. Bruce is a lot of things, stubborn, > sometimes temperamental, a lot of times like you... a hot head but he does > not take credit for other people's work in my experience.
On the whole, Bruce is a much nicer guy than I am. But I can't see eye to eye with him on this. I admit I may be being unfair to him, but I'm telling it like I see it. Like I do. > Even if there was, so what? IF EDB wants to have a secret plan to push a lot > of cool features to .Org, who cares? In the end, it all has to go through > peer review and the meritocracy anyway. I would just like to say that if I or my employer ever get accused of having a nefarious plan, and somehow I get to pick *which* nefarious plan I or my employer is to be accused of having, "a secret plan to push a lot of cool features to .Org" sounds like a good one for me to pick, especially since, yeah, we have that plan. We plan to (try to) push a lot of cool features to .Org. We - or at least I - do not plan to do it in a way that is anything but respectful to the community process. Specifically, and in no particular order, we plan to continue contributing performance and scalability enhancements, improvements to parallel query, and FDW-related improvements, just as we have for 9.6. We may also try to contribute other stuff that we think will be cool and benefit PostgreSQL. Suggestions are welcome. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers