On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 2:37 AM, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > On 2016/03/09 10:11, Amit Langote wrote: >> The attached revision addresses above and one of Horiguchi-san's comments >> in his email yesterday. > > I fixed one more issue in 0002 per Horiguchi-san's comment. Sorry about > so many versions.
I've committed 0001 with heavy revisions. Just because we don't need an SQL-visible function to clear the command progress doesn't mean we don't need to clear it at all; rather, it has to happen automatically. I also did a bunch of identifier renaming, added datid to the view output, adjusted the comments, and so on. Please rebase the remainder of the series. Thanks. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers