On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> IMO this is not committable as-is, and I don't think that it's something >>> that will become committable during this 'fest. I think we'd be well >>> advised to boot it to the 2016-09 CF and focus our efforts on other stuff >>> that has a better chance of getting finished this month. > >> Yeah, I would believe that a good first step would be to discuss >> deeply about that directly at PGCon for folks that will be there and >> interested in the subject. It seems like a good timing to brainstorm >> things F2F at the developer unconference for example, a couple of >> months before the 1st CF of 9.7. We may perhaps (or not) get to >> cleaner picture of what kind of things are wanted in this area. > > Yeah, the whole area seems like a great topic for some unconference > sessions.
I agree. I think this is a problem we really need to solve, and I think talking about it will help us figure out the best solution. I'd also be interested in hearing Kevin Grittner's thoughts about serializability in a distributed environment, since he's obviously thought about the topic of serializability quite a bit. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers