David G. Johnston wrote: > Tom doesn't care enough to veto and you don't really care... > > I'll admit it's awkward because it's abbreviated but if someone enters > \watch 5 and then sees (5s) in the title I think they can put two and two > together. > > If the watched query takes a long to run, or there is a disruption, knowing > when the last one ran and how often it is supposed to run is useful info to > have at ones fingertips. I have done this myself occasionally so I'm not > speaking from theory. But I won't complain if its removed.
I like David's UI better FWIW. (I'll also use this opportunity to complain again about not being able to use floating point sleep time.) -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
