On Mar 27, 2016, at 7:20 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I do not know whether this would be a meaningful improvement for
> common use-cases, though.

It would certainly be a step forward over the current situation.  It would mean 
that a specific imaginable use-case (inserting a new enum value, then 
populating a dimension table for it) would have to be done as two migrations 
rather than one, but that is much more doable in most tools than having a 
migration run without a transaction at all.

-- Christophe Pettus

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to