Oleg Bartunov <obartu...@gmail.com> writes: > Should we start thinking about ICU ?
Isn't it still true that ICU fails to meet our minimum requirements? That would include (a) working with the full Unicode character range (not only UTF16) and (b) working with non-Unicode encodings. No doubt we could deal with (b) by inserting a conversion, but that would take a lot of shine off the performance numbers you mention. I'm also not exactly convinced by your implicit assumption that ICU is bug-free. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers