Oleg Bartunov <obartu...@gmail.com> writes:
> Should we start thinking about ICU ?
Advertising
Isn't it still true that ICU fails to meet our minimum requirements?
That would include (a) working with the full Unicode character range
(not only UTF16) and (b) working with non-Unicode encodings. No doubt
we could deal with (b) by inserting a conversion, but that would take
a lot of shine off the performance numbers you mention.
I'm also not exactly convinced by your implicit assumption that ICU is
bug-free.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
