Oleg Bartunov <obartu...@gmail.com> writes:
> Should we start thinking about ICU ?

Isn't it still true that ICU fails to meet our minimum requirements?
That would include (a) working with the full Unicode character range
(not only UTF16) and (b) working with non-Unicode encodings.  No doubt
we could deal with (b) by inserting a conversion, but that would take
a lot of shine off the performance numbers you mention.

I'm also not exactly convinced by your implicit assumption that ICU is
bug-free.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to