On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote:
Advertising
> All, > > Changed the thread name (we're no longer talking about release > notes...). > > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > > Oleg Bartunov <obartu...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Should we start thinking about ICU ? > > > > Isn't it still true that ICU fails to meet our minimum requirements? > > That would include (a) working with the full Unicode character range > > (not only UTF16) and (b) working with non-Unicode encodings. No doubt > > we could deal with (b) by inserting a conversion, but that would take > > a lot of shine off the performance numbers you mention. > > > > I'm also not exactly convinced by your implicit assumption that ICU is > > bug-free. > > We have a wiki page about ICU. I'm not sure that it's current, but if > it isn't and people are interested then perhaps we should update it: > > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo:ICU > > Good point, I forget about this page. > If we're going to talk about minimum requirements, I'd like to argue > that we require whatever system we're using to have versioning (which > glibc currently lacks, as I understand it...) to avoid the risk that > indexes will become corrupt when whatever we're using for collation > changes. I'm pretty sure that's already bitten us on at least some > RHEL6 -> RHEL7 migrations in some locales, even forgetting the issues > with strcoll vs. strxfrm. > agree. > > Regarding key abbreviation and performance, if we are confident that > strcoll and strxfrm are at least independently internally consistent > then we could consider offering an option to choose between them. > We'd need to identify what each index was built with to do so, however, > as they would need to be rebuilt if the choice changes, at least > until/unless they're made to reliably agree. Even using only one or the > other doesn't address the versioning problem though, which is a problem > for all currently released versions of PG and is just going to continue > to be an issue. > Ideally, we should benchmarking all locales on all platforms for all kind indexes. But that's big project. > > Thanks! > > Stephen >
