Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> writes: > I just noticed that the release notes mention char(n) as affected. > That's not actually true, because char(n) SortSupport only came in > 9.6. The Wiki page now shows this, which may be the most important > place, but ideally we'd fix this in the release notes. I guess it's > too late.
Well, too late for 9.5.2 anyway. It still makes sense to correct that text for future releases. I'm inclined to wait a little bit though and see what other improvements become apparent. For instance, I think the point about non-first index columns not being affected is of greater weight than you seem to place on it. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers