On 2016-04-01 13:50:10 +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote: > I think it needs more number of runs.. After seeing this results I did not > run head+pinunpin, > > Head 64 Client 128 Client > ----------------------------------------------------- > Run1 434860 356945 > Run2 275815 *275815* > Run3 437872 366560 > Patch 64 Client 128 Client > ----------------------------------------------------- > Run1 429520 372958 > Run2 446249 *167189* > Run3 431066 381592 > Patch+Pinunpin 64 Client 128 Client > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Run1 338298 642535 > Run2 406240 644187 > Run3 595439 *285420 *
Could you describe the exact setup a bit more? Postgres settings, pgbench parameters, etc. What's the size of BufferDesc after applying the patch? Thanks, Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
