On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:

> Hm, interesting. I suspect that's because of the missing backoff in my
> experimental patch. If you apply the attached patch ontop of that
> (requires infrastructure from pinunpin), how does performance develop?

I have applied this patch also, but still results are same, I mean around
550,000 with 64 threads and 650,000 with 128 client with lot of

*128 client

run1 645769
run2 643161
run3 *285546*
run4 *289421*
run5 630772
run6 *284363*

Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Reply via email to