Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Teodor Sigaev wrote: >> may be <=>? it isn't used anywhere yet. >> >> select 'fat'::tsquery <=> 'cat'; >> select 'fat <=> cat'::tsquery; >> select 'fat <3> cat'::tsqyery; -- for non-default distance.
> Dunno. That looks pretty "relationalish". The existing precedent in the geometric types is to use <-> as an operator denoting distance. Perhaps <-> amd <3> would work here. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers