On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> >> may be <=>? it isn't used anywhere yet.
> >>
> >> select 'fat'::tsquery <=> 'cat';
> >> select 'fat <=> cat'::tsquery;
> >> select 'fat <3> cat'::tsqyery; -- for non-default distance.
>
> > Dunno.  That looks pretty "relationalish".
>
> The existing precedent in the geometric types is to use <->
> as an operator denoting distance.  Perhaps <-> amd <3>
> would work here.
>
>
looks like we get consensus about arrows.


>                         regards, tom lane
>

Reply via email to