* Craig Ringer (cr...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > On 4 April 2016 at 10:13, Dave Cramer <p...@fastcrypt.com> wrote: > > Async notification is the easier part, I wasn't aware that the ssl library > > had this problem though > > AFAIK the issue is that even if there are bytes available on the underlying > socket, the SSL lib doesn't know if that means there are bytes readable > from the wrapped SSL socket. The traffic on the underlying socket could be > renegotiation messages or whatever. > > We really need non-blocking reads.
That would certainly be a good way to address this, but I'm guessing it's non-trivial to implement. Thanks! Stephen
Description: Digital signature