Corey Huinker <corey.huin...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I'm not Jim, but I have a question: what's the motivation for the >> Fortran-order traversal of the result (down rows before across columns)?
> If I am understanding you correctly, it does work the way you find > intuitive: all results from the first row are executed before any in the > second row, so Oh, I hadn't checked the code closely enough to realize that, but I see you're right. The patch's documentation seems very confusing on the point, though: + The secondary queries are executed in top-to-bottom, left-to-right order, so the command I took that as meaning what I said above. >> It should clear that in all the same >> places where gfname or gset_prefix get cleared. > I'm only seeing one place where those two vars are deallocated and nulled, > and that's at the tail end of SendQuery. Were you expecting more than just > that? That may be the only place; I've not looked around. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers