At Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:00:24 +0900, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote in <cad21aodoq1uby4kkkhra9jzavxekwat7gv5pqjbs+wj98b9...@mail.gmail.com> > > For this case, the tree members of SyncRepConfig are '2[Sby1,', > > 'Sby2', "Sby3]'. This syntax is valid for the current > > specification but will surely get different meaning by the future > > changes. We should refuse this known-to-be-wrong-in-future syntax > > from now. > > I couldn't get your point but why will the above syntax meaning be > different from current meaning by future change? > I thought that another method uses another kind of parentheses.
If the 'another kind of parehtheses' is a pair of brackets, an application_name 'tokyo[A]', for example, is currently allowed to occur unquoted in the list but will become disallowed by the syntax change. regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers